By Andy Wang     Photo：CANVA

A few days ago, I was having dinner with some fellow freight forwarders. Someone brought up a B2B client.

This brand makes smart home appliances, such as water purifiers and robot vacuums. They've been selling mainly on FBA for years, and recently started seriously looking into overseas warehousing. Then last year, their products started getting heavier. Not in sales volume, but physically heavier. FBA storage fees, holiday peak fulfillment fees, and aged inventory surcharges (all clearly defined in Amazon's official rate cards) started eating into margins. Around peak seasons, they also had to scramble for space.

"He knew he should be using an overseas warehouse," my colleague said. "He talked to four providers. Six months later, he still couldn't sign."

I didn't say anything, but my mind was already running.

This kind of hesitation, we hear it all the time. It's not that they think overseas warehousing is too expensive. It's not that they don't see the value. They're just afraid of making the wrong bet.

Afraid of signing a one-year contract and the market turns south.
Afraid their volume isn't big enough to be taken seriously.
Afraid the invoice will show up with line items no one mentioned during sales.
Afraid they'll ask for more labor and space during peak season, and even if they're told yes, it won't actually happen.

None of these fears are unfounded. Every single one has happened to someone.

But here's what I've noticed: after a year or sometimes longer of hesitation, the ones who finally stop don't figure out "how great overseas warehouses are." They already knew that.

What they figure out is something else.

1. They Stop Asking "Who's Cheaper?" and Start Asking "What Does Your Invoice Actually Look Like?"

The question I get asked most often these days isn't "What's your storage rate?"

It's: "Do you charge for receiving? How do you define handling? What's the per-unit cost for relabeling? Is there a markup on shipping? Do you charge an integration fee for system access?"

When I first started in this industry, I thought these questions were overly detailed—almost difficult to answer. Later I realized: this isn't being picky. This is tuition.

Too many people sign a contract based on the storage rate. Ten bucks a pallet per month, twenty bucks—looks reasonable. Then the invoice arrives. Receiving fee, put-away fee, picking fee, packaging materials, long-term storage surcharge, monthly minimum. Every line item was on the rate sheet. No one told you how much they'd actually add up to.

It's not that warehouses are hiding anything. It's that the rate structure is unbundled by nature. Like service charge, corkage fee, appetizers at a restaurant. You don't ask, you don't know what the meal really costs.

The ones who finally stop searching aren't looking for the "cheapest" warehouse. They're looking for someone willing to show them what the invoice actually looks like.

Three things they've learned to do:

1. "Can you give me a sample rate sheet and let me run a simulation with my own shipment profile?"
2. "Let's take my largest shipment from the past six months and calculate the all-in cost, covering everything from receiving to final outbound."
3. "Show me clearly: which charges are transaction-based, and which are fixed monthly?"

Sounds basic, doesn't it?

But the ones who actually do this? They've already crossed the longest mile of the hesitation marathon.

2. They Stop Worrying About "Not Enough Volume" and Start Asking "How Will You Help Me Through the Slow Months?"

Water purifiers. Fitness equipment. Seasonal home appliances. Sellers in these categories all dread the off-season.

Not because they're not selling. Because the warehouse still bills you, even when nothing moves.

This is where a lot of people get stuck. They ask me: "My volume isn't huge—maybe two or three inbound shipments a month. Will an overseas warehouse take me seriously? And when peak season hits and I need more labor and space—will I be first in line, or last?"

Fair questions. No easy answers.

But here's what the ones who finally moved forward did:

They stopped looking for warehouses that say "yes to everything." They started looking for ones that see the off-season as a long-term investment.

This isn't sentiment. It's arithmetic.

Empty pallet positions are empty whether you're using them or not. A predictable baseline volume during slow months, in exchange for a stable partnership? Smart warehouses do this math.

So here's what experienced clients have learned to ask. Of course, not every warehouse is willing to go there. But if you never ask, you'll never know if they're the kind of warehouse that already offers flexible arrangements like "off-peak storage" or "seasonal hold."

"If I commit to a year, can we flex down my reserved space during the slow months?"
"Or if I keep the space, would you consider placing my inventory in a lower-cost storage zone?"
"Does your contract have something like a 'hibernation clause'? I pay a minimal fee when my inventory isn't turning, and we top it up before peak season."

These aren't tricks clients invented. They learned them through real negotiations—some rejected, some accepted. Slowly, it becomes experience.

And experience like this? You won't find it in any "overseas warehouse sourcing guide" online.

3. They Stop Chasing "Multi-Node Networks" and Start Asking: "Can We Run One Location First—Really Run It?"

This is another classic hesitation trap.

Clients read industry reports. "Position inventory closer to demand." "Multi-node deployment." "Risk diversification." So their first question becomes: "Do you have warehouses in the U.S.—West Coast, East Coast, South? Can I sign for all of them at once?"

My usual response is a question.

"The inventory you have in your current warehouse—can you reconcile it, from receiving to outbound, down to the unit?"

It's an unfair question. Seven out of ten pause.

The hard part about overseas warehousing isn't "finding three locations." It's getting one location to run cleanly. Only after that can you replicate the process to the next.

I've seen more than one client handling products that require after-sales service and serial traceability—such as certain electronic devices or industrial instruments—open their first U.S. warehouse. First six months: inventory reports never matched their ERP. Not because the warehouse was sloppy. Because the two systems had completely different logic for tracking lots and serial numbers. They spent three months redefining every inbound field, every inspection photo format, every exception reporting protocol. That's how they got the first warehouse to run clean.
The second warehouse, the following year. Time to operational stability: three months → three weeks.
Those several weeks? That's the real value of a multi-node network.

It's not the starting line. It's the trophy.

The ones who didn't get burned after a year of hesitation? They all heard this sentence and took it seriously:

Get one warehouse running clean—reports, exceptions, returns. The second one will grow from that, not from a map.

4. What They Finally Figured Out Wasn't Really About Warehousing

Let me finish the story.

My colleague's client—the one who talked to four providers and still couldn't sign? He eventually did sign.

Not because he found the perfect warehouse. He said he looked everywhere. It doesn't exist.

He signed because he finally understood something.

He did the math himself. The six months he spent shopping for warehouses cost him more than a year's worth of that warehouse's storage fees.

Time he could have spent launching new SKUs, opening new sales channels, or honestly—just sleeping better.

This isn't a punchline. In this industry, we say logistics costs come in two forms.

One is the number on the invoice.
The other is the decision-maker's time.

The first can be optimized.
The second can only be wasted.

There's no "zero waste" way to approach overseas warehousing. The question is whether you can accept a certain level of waste—and use the time you save to make more money elsewhere.

The client said something on the day he signed. I still remember it.

"I didn't figure out that overseas warehousing is a good deal. I figured out—I should stop spending my time figuring it out."

Finally, to Anyone Still Hesitating

If you've read this far and still think, "I know all this. I'm just not ready to decide."

That's fine. More than fine. It's normal.

Because overseas warehousing was never really about "renting space to store inventory."

Its real job is to turn your conviction about the market into inventory—ahead of demand.

Yes, it looks like a bet.
       

But the ones who waited a year and didn't lose?
They didn't win because they bet on the right market.
They won because they bet on the right person to place the bet with.

Someone who would walk them through the invoice math.
Someone who saw the off-season as a long-term partnership, not idle capacity.
Someone who insisted on running one warehouse clean before talking about the second.

And someone like that doesn't disappear after you sign.

Because your inventory is now in their facility, inside their WMS, tied to their SLA.

This article is for everyone who already knows overseas warehousing is the answer. You know it, but you're still standing at the edge, deciding whether to open the book.

If that's you, come talk to us.
No RFP. No pitch deck.

My colleagues spend their time in these conversations with people just like you. 
Think of it as coffee with someone who actually gets it. 

Appreciate if you could share TGL Blog among your friends who are interested in first-hand market information of supply chain and updated economic incidents.