By Eric Huang    Photo：CANVA

Not long ago, for most people working in logistics, “geopolitical risk” was little more than a term that appeared occasionally in risk reports or boardroom presentations. Everyone knew it existed, and everyone understood—at least in theory—that it could have an impact. But in day-to-day operations, cargo still moved, ships still sailed, and payments usually cleared without much trouble. Sanctions felt much the same: distant, abstract, and seemingly relevant only to a small group of high-risk countries or niche industries. For the majority of logistics professionals, they felt far removed from daily reality.

That world no longer exists.

By 2025, geopolitics has moved decisively from the background to center stage. It now directly shapes how global trade and logistics function. It determines which routes can be used, which vessels are acceptable, which payments can pass through the financial system, and whether a transaction can be completed from start to finish. Sanctions are no longer just lines of legal text. They act much more like market forces—quietly but continuously reshaping freight rate structures, insurance costs, transit times, and overall operational risk.

What truly distinguishes the current era from the past is not simply that there are more conflicts or political tensions. The deeper change is that politics has penetrated the mechanics of trade itself. Ports, shipping lanes, vessels, financial payments, and even the movement of data and technology are increasingly treated as tools of power. Trade routes are no longer just commercial infrastructure; they are strategic assets. Sanctions are no longer isolated punitive measures; they are part of integrated systems designed to influence behavior and restructure markets.

From an operational perspective, the most significant shift is this: sanctions are no longer short-term disruptions. They have become structural constraints. When a vessel is excluded from the mainstream market because of sanctions or elevated risk, the impact goes far beyond a single voyage. It affects the allocation of capacity across the entire market. Fewer usable ships mean tighter supply, higher freight rates, and cargo being pushed onto longer or less efficient routes. Even companies with no direct involvement in sanctioned trade feel the effects.

Put simply, sanctions now influence markets in much the same way as rising fuel prices or port congestion—except they tend to arrive more suddenly and are far harder to predict.

Nowhere is this more visible than in maritime transport. Major shipping lanes that were once taken for granted can now become unsafe almost overnight due to political events. The experience in the Red Sea illustrates this clearly. What began as a regional security issue quickly escalated into a global logistics nightmare, forcing large numbers of vessels to reroute around the Cape of Good Hope. Transit times lengthened, costs surged, and schedules became increasingly unreliable.

Even when tensions ease and some carriers cautiously test a return to original routes, the risk does not truly disappear. It simply takes a different form. It becomes embedded in freight rates, insurance clauses, and contractual language—an unspoken but unavoidable assumption that everyone factors in, even if few say it out loud.

At the same time, sanctions have quietly reshaped the global shipping fleet itself. The concept of the “shadow fleet” is no longer something discussed only within compliance departments. It is now a reality that every logistics professional must understand. These vessels may still be technically seaworthy, but because of sanctions exposure, inadequate insurance, opaque ownership, or consistently high-risk operating practices, they are considered untouchable by the mainstream market. Frequent flag changes, disabled tracking systems, and layered intermediaries have become standard features of this parallel fleet.

On the surface, these ships may look no different from ordinary commercial vessels. In reality, they operate in a separate maritime ecosystem—one that has a significant and growing impact on the broader market.

Even companies that avoid sanctioned cargo entirely are not insulated from the consequences. The number of vessels acceptable to banks and insurers shrinks, tightening the market. Due diligence processes take longer. Payments slow down. Ports and service providers have become more cautious. These costs are not always clearly visible in price quotations, but they accumulate in daily operations, making logistics slower, more expensive, and increasingly difficult to explain to customers.

Many companies still assume that sanctions risk only matters if they deal directly with sanctioned parties. That assumption is now outdated. Enforcement today is focused less on who you are and more on what you enable. If your services materially facilitate sanctioned activity, you may face exposure even if you are not a sanctioned entity yourself.

This is precisely why freight forwarders, NVOCCs, shipbrokers, port agents, warehouse operators, and other logistics service providers are now firmly within the scope of sanctions enforcement. Compliance is no longer a back-office function. It has moved directly into front-line operations.

As a result, the skills required of front-line staff have changed. Sales teams, operations personnel, and documentation specialists all need a basic understanding of sanctions. They must be able to spot warning signs: documents that do not align, routes that make little commercial sense, sudden changes in counterparties, or unusual payment arrangements. These are no longer minor administrative issues; they are potential triggers for serious risk.

Geopolitical risk has also expanded well beyond shipping and energy into technology and manufacturing supply chains. Semiconductors, advanced electronics, and telecommunications equipment are now treated as strategic assets. Export controls, tariffs, and investment restrictions are increasingly used as tools to reshape industrial policy. For logistics providers, this means that what was once a straightforward product description or tariff classification can suddenly become a highly sensitive compliance issue.

These shifts force companies to rethink sourcing strategies, inventory placement, and routing decisions. Cost and efficiency are no longer the only considerations. Political and regulatory risk now carry equal weight. In this environment, logistics expertise is no longer measured solely by speed or execution, but by the ability to anticipate trends and navigate uncertainty.

Perhaps most importantly, sanctions enforcement is moving closer to physical operations. Risk is no longer limited to fines imposed after the fact. It can materialize while cargo is still in transit. Vessels may be denied port access. Payments can be frozen. Cargo may sit in limbo, unable to move forward or back.

In this context, contract design takes on unprecedented importance. Incoterms, the timing of title transfer, force majeure provisions, and sanctions clauses are no longer boilerplate language. They determine who bears responsibility for delays, additional costs, and legal exposure when things go wrong.

The companies best positioned to succeed in this environment are not those trying to avoid geopolitical risk entirely. Instead, they acknowledge it and build it into their supply chain design. By preserving routing flexibility, diversifying carriers and financial partners, and investing in robust compliance processes, they make risk manageable rather than unpredictable.

Crucially, these companies are also willing to be honest about the cost of risk. Today’s freight rates reflect far more than distance and fuel. They also incorporate political uncertainty and burdens of compliance. Underestimating these costs may improve pricing in the short term, but it almost always leads to far greater losses later.

Looking ahead, there is little reason to believe geopolitical risk will fade anytime soon. Global trade is becoming more fragmented and more regionalized. Sanctions and restrictions are increasingly the norm rather than the exception. In this world, logistics is no longer simply about moving goods from point A to point B. It is a long-term test of judgment, flexibility, and risk management.

Appreciate if you could share TGL Blog among your friends who are interested in first-hand market information of supply chain and updated economic incidents.