By Eric Huang    Photo：CANVA

For years, automation at U.S. ports has been a contentious issue, fueling ongoing disputes between labor unions and employers. This tug-of-war over the future of port operations has far-reaching implications—not only for workers’ job security and the stability of the supply chain that supports the U.S. economy but also for the global shipping market. With the specter of another paralyzing port strike looming, the role of automation has become an urgent problem demanding resolution.

The debate over port automation is not new. As technological advancements continue to reshape the shipping industry, this conflict has its roots in changes that began decades ago. In the late 20th century, ports transitioned from labor-intensive manual operations to containerized shipping, introducing cranes and other machinery that significantly improved efficiency but also displaced countless workers. Today’s disputes mirror this historical pattern of technology disrupting industry. In 1977, the International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) staged a strike over similar concerns about job reductions due to modernization. Nearly 50 years later, the story remains the same: workers fear that automation threatens their livelihoods, while employers argue that technology is essential for enhancing efficiency and competitiveness.

On October 1, 2024, the ILA launched a three-day strike, halting operations at ports along the East Coast and the Gulf of Mexico. This action, which disrupted key shipping hubs from New England to Texas, underscored the high stakes of the automation debate. The strike ended on October 3 with a temporary agreement, including wage increases for dockworkers and an extension of the current master contract until January 15, 2025. However, automation remains a central issue. The ILA has called for a complete ban on automated and semi-automated equipment, citing concerns about job security and economic stability. Meanwhile, the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) insists that automation is crucial for the long-term sustainability and efficiency of American ports.

From the ILA’s perspective, automation poses an existential threat. Union leaders argue that replacing human labor with machines undermines the economic security of thousands of dockworkers. They also contend that automation does not necessarily translate to cost savings for consumers. For example, in the automotive industry, automation has resulted in higher prices and widespread job losses. The ILA is particularly worried about the potential financial impact on its "container royalties" system—fees generated when union-operated cranes handle containers, providing a critical source of income for dockworkers. Increased automation could diminish these royalties, further jeopardizing workers' livelihoods.

Research on automation's impact on jobs reveals complex and conflicting results. Some studies indicate that automation reduces employment. For instance, a report by the Economic Roundtable estimated that automation at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach eliminated 572 full-time jobs annually between 2020 and 2021. In contrast, a study commissioned by the Pacific Maritime Association (PMA) found that automation boosted throughput, attracting more business and ultimately increasing union jobs. These contradictory findings highlight the need for careful planning and collaboration to ensure that technological advancements benefit both workers and the broader economy.

Investing in workforce development could address workers’ concerns. Training programs can help employees adapt to new technologies and transition to specialized roles requiring advanced skills. For example, on the West Coast, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) partnered with the PMA to establish a training center at the Port of Los Angeles, offering courses on maintaining and operating automated equipment. This model demonstrates how unions and employers can work together to tackle the challenges of technological change. Another potential compromise involves negotiating terms to protect workers' rights. European port unions have successfully secured agreements that include automation-related unemployment protections. Adding similar provisions to U.S. contracts could help both parties mitigate the risks of technological disruption.

The outcome of negotiations between the ILA and USMX will have significant implications for the U.S. economy. Ports are vital nodes in the global supply chain, handling hundreds of billions of dollars in goods annually. Prolonged labor disputes or resistance to modernization could weaken the competitiveness of U.S. ports, redirecting shipping to more efficient international ports. At the same time, this debate reflects broader societal challenges: how to balance the benefits of technological innovation with the need to protect workers’ rights and economic security. As automation continues to reshape industries worldwide, finding equitable solutions to these dilemmas will only grow in importance.

Appreciate if you could share TGL Blog among your friends who are interested in first-hand market information of supply chain and updated economic incidents.